Claim: is the Iran peace deal in Pakistan just a stunt while they secretly build nuclear weapons

The claim that the Iran peace deal in Pakistan is merely a stunt while secretly building nuclear weapons is mostly false. Mainstream sources report that the peace talks ended without an agreement, with Iran refusing to commit to US demands regarding nuclear weapons. However, there is no concrete evidence supporting the notion that Iran is secretly developing nuclear weapons during these negotiations. Critics argue that the failure of the talks is due to mutual mistrust and irreconcilable demands rather than a hidden agenda of weaponization. This indicates that the claim lacks substantial backing from credible sources. The models diverge sharply — treat this as higher-uncertainty. Gemini comes in highest (50%), while Perplexity is lowest (20%). Perplexity expresses higher confidence than Gemini on this claim. While some sources suggest that Iran's refusal to abandon its nuclear ambitions during the talks could imply ulterior motives, there is no direct evidence of secret nuclear weapons development. The opposing view emphasizes that the collapse of negotiations stemmed from disagreements over nuclear terms rather than any covert actions. This lack of definitive proof regarding secret weaponization contributes to the uncertainty surrounding the claim, leading to a mostly false verdict despite the concerns raised by some analysts.