Claim: Trump has repeatedly claimed his 2025 strikes obliterated Iran's nuclear program, but the IAEA says the program was damaged, not destroyed

The claim that Trump's strikes obliterated Iran's nuclear program is mostly false. While Trump and some officials assert significant damage was done, the IAEA and other assessments indicate that the program was severely damaged but not destroyed. The IAEA's Director General has explicitly stated that the strikes could not fully eliminate the program due to its underground infrastructure. Critics argue that the term 'obliterated' is misleading and does not reflect the reality of the situation, as key components and stockpiles remain intact. The graders interpret the evidence differently, so the score range widens. Gemini comes in highest (50%), while OpenAI is lowest (30%). OpenAI expresses higher confidence than Gemini on this claim. Opposing sources, particularly from the White House, assert that the strikes resulted in 'monumental damage' and claim that the term 'obliteration' is justified based on satellite imagery and assessments from Israeli officials. However, these claims do not align with the IAEA's findings, which emphasize that while damage occurred, the core elements of Iran's nuclear program were not destroyed. This discrepancy highlights the complexity of the situation and the differing interpretations of the strikes' effectiveness, contributing to the uncertainty surrounding the claim's absolute truthfulness.