Claim: Is valentine's day a federal holiday?

First requested: February 5, 2025 at 7:26 AM
Last updated: April 8, 2026 at 9:13 AM
8%

IsItCap Score

Truth Potential Meter

Not Credible

AI consensusMedium

Grader consensus is moderate.
Range 1%–12% (spread Δ11).
The graders lean in the same direction but differ on strength. Skim the summary and sources.
Read analysis summary

OpenAI Grade

0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
1%

Perplexity Grade

0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
12%

Google Gemini Grade

0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
10%

Analysis Summary

Based on our comprehensive analysis, the claim that Valentines Day is a federal holiday is definitively false. This conclusion is supported by multiple mainstream sources, including CountyOffice.org and USA Federal Holidays, which categorically state that Valentines Day does not hold the status of a federal holiday. The grades assigned reflect high source credibility and strong expert consensus on this matter. However, alternative perspectives highlight the cultural and economic significance of Valentines Day, even if they do not challenge its legal status.

The evidence supporting this conclusion is robust, with federal holiday calendars and legal definitions clearly excluding Valentines Day. The Federal Reserve Systems holiday schedule also does not include Valentines Day, further reinforcing its status as a non-federal holiday. While alternative…

Source Analysis

Mainstream Sources

Publication

Title

Valentine's Day Analysis

Summary

Source details

Publication

Title

2025 Federal Holidays USA

Summary

Source details

Publication

Title

Federal Reserve System Holiday Schedule

Summary

Source details

Alternative Sources

Publication

Title

Alternative Perspectives on Holidays

Summary

Source details

Publication

Title

Conspiracy Theories on Holiday Recognition

Summary

Source details

Publication

Title

Reddit Discussion on Holidays

Summary

Source details

Analysis Breakdown

How to read the breakdown

  • Truth: how well sources support the core claim.
  • Source reliability: whether the sources have a strong track record.
  • Independence: whether coverage looks one-sided or recycled.
  • Context: missing details (timeframe, definitions, scope) that change meaning.
  • Tip: if graders disagree, rely more on the summary + sources than the single number.

Detailed AnalysisPremium Feature

Get an in-depth analysis of content accuracy, source credibility, potential biases, contextual factors, claim origins, and hidden perspectives.

Create a free account to unlock premium features.

Methodology