Claim: Is nuclear power safer than coal?

Nuclear power is mostly safer than coal, as supported by various studies indicating significantly lower death rates associated with nuclear energy. Research from Our World in Data highlights that nuclear energy results in 99.8% fewer deaths than coal per unit of electricity produced. Additionally, a comparative health risk assessment shows that coal-fired energy poses about 12 times the health risk of nuclear energy in China. However, some experts argue that nuclear energy carries risks that are harder to quantify, which complicates the safety comparison. All three graders point in the same direction, with minor differences. Gemini comes in highest (95%), while OpenAI is lowest (85%). While the evidence strongly supports the claim that nuclear power is safer than coal, some sources highlight the inherent risks associated with nuclear energy that are not easily quantifiable. For instance, the Stanford University source notes that although coal is more dangerous in measurable categories, nuclear energy has risks that are difficult to assess. This perspective does not negate the overall safety advantage of nuclear power but suggests that a comprehensive evaluation of safety must consider both quantifiable and unquantifiable risks.