IsItCap Score
Truth Potential MeterVery Low Credibility
Very Low Credibility
newsbusters.org
STUDY: George Soros Gave 'May Day Strong' Lefties Protesting Billionaires $115M
© 2005-2026, Media Research Center. All Rights Reserved. ... Sorry Rachel Maddow, but radical lefties thumping their chests about protests advocating “workers over billionaires” while getting funding from America’s most notorious billionaire is the most contradictory antithesis of “grassroots.” · As leftist groups across the country (including Hawaii) prepare for a wave of 750+ communist-style protests against President Donald Trump and the bourgeoisies dubbed “May Day Strong,” MRC Business investigated the nearly 500 groups that currently make up the lefty “coalition.” At least 33 of the groups, some of which boast national reach with multiple local chapters hosting events in their jurisdictions, received $115,124,845 from George Soros between 2016 and 2026.
—
snopes.com
Analyzing rumor George Soros, Neville Roy Singham funded groups behind 'No Kings' protests | Snopes.com
<strong>A network of 500 activist groups with $3 billion in revenue is behind the "No Kings" protests</strong>. They claim they are a loose coalition of activist organizations. These protests are organized, funded, and coordinated at a national level.
—
washingtontimes.com
May Day worker-oriented events promoted by groups funded by billionaires
Singham, who lives in Shanghai, is funneling an estimated $278 million into the groups driving street mobilizations in the U.S., such as the May Day demonstrations and No Kings protests. Indivisible, one of the largest Democratic Party-aligned grassroots networks, has at least 200 chapters promoting May Day events. The organization has received millions from billionaire philanthropist George Soros.
—
No alternative sources were found for this analysis.
Get an in-depth analysis of content accuracy, source credibility, potential biases, contextual factors, claim origins, and hidden perspectives.
Create a free account to unlock premium features.
We collect sources that support and challenge the claim, then summarize the strongest points from each side. Here’s what we look for:
Each report combines three independent graders and a source-based rubric to produce a clear, repeatable credibility score:
Each factor contributes to the final credibility score through a weighted algorithm that prioritizes factual accuracy and source reliability while considering contextual factors and potential biases.
We trace the claim's origins and examine the broader context in which it emerged.
Our analysis uncovers less obvious perspectives and potential interpretations.
We identify and analyze potential biases in source materials and narratives.
While our analysis strives for maximum accuracy, we recommend using this report as part of a broader fact-checking toolkit.