Claim: A secret White House spreadsheet ranks companies by loyalty to Trump.

First requested: August 17, 2025 at 10:11 AM
Last updated: April 6, 2026 at 9:18 AM
26%

IsItCap Score

Truth Potential Meter

Not Credible

AI consensusWeak

Grader consensus is weak.
Range 20%–92% (spread Δ72).
The graders diverge. Treat the combined score as uncertain and read the sources carefully.
Read analysis summary

OpenAI Grade

0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
21%

Perplexity Grade

0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
92%

Google Gemini Grade

0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
20%

Analysis Summary

Based on what we could find, the claim that a secret White House spreadsheet ranks companies by loyalty to Trump is strongly supported by multiple credible mainstream sources such as Axios, Common Dreams, and Benzinga. These outlets report with detailed insider information that the Trump White House created and circulated among senior staff a scorecard evaluating over 500 companies on their support for key Trump policies, especially the One Big Beautiful Bill (OB3). The grades given reflect the claims strong factual basis and consistent corroboration across independent mainstream media.

The strongest evidence comes from Axios and Common Dreams, which cite senior White House officials and insiders confirming the spreadsheets existence, the use of public metrics like social media posts, press releases, ads, and attendance at White House events to rate…

Source Analysis

Mainstream Sources

Publication

Title

White House Scorecard Rates Companies Based on How ...

Summary

Source details

Publication

Title

Scoop: White House loyalty rating for companies

Summary

Source details

Publication

Title

White House Rates 553 firms on support for Trump policies

Summary

Source details

Alternative Sources

Publication

Title

Opinion: White House loyalty scorecard is authoritarian overreach

Summary

Source details

Publication

Title

Analysis: White House loyalty ratings raise ethical and legal questions

Summary

Source details

Publication

Title

Corporate loyalty scorecard: a sign of a crumbling democratic process

Summary

Source details

Analysis Breakdown

How to read the breakdown

  • Truth: how well sources support the core claim.
  • Source reliability: whether the sources have a strong track record.
  • Independence: whether coverage looks one-sided or recycled.
  • Context: missing details (timeframe, definitions, scope) that change meaning.
  • Tip: if graders disagree, rely more on the summary + sources than the single number.

Detailed AnalysisPremium Feature

Get an in-depth analysis of content accuracy, source credibility, potential biases, contextual factors, claim origins, and hidden perspectives.

Create a free account to unlock premium features.

Methodology